I’ve been a little out of the loop lately, tied down with projects. Something that caught my eye this morning was this news post over on CNET. The article talks about Google being upset over Microsoft’s new browser, IE 7, because it supports a search feature that defaults to MSN Search.
Google is claiming the new browser limits consumer choice, and is comparing this action to the antitrust case of the late 90’s, when Microsoft was found guilty of abusing monopoly power over its operating system and browser. Apparently Google was in recent talks with the US Justice Department and the European Commission over the issue.
Marissa Mayer, vice president for search products at Google, stated: “The market favors open choice for search, and companies should compete for users based on the quality of their search services. We don’t think it’s right for Microsoft to just set the default to MSN. We believe users should choose.”
I realize that Microsoft is no angel. However, out of the top three engines MSN Search is the least favored, while Google holds a whopping share of the market (49 percent in the US compared to MSN’s 11 percent). I personally see nothing wrong with Microsoft trying to beef up its user base through a product they created. Google is no slouch when it comes to making huge amounts of cash. If Google feels this is a potential problem for their market share, perhaps they should invest some of that surplus cash into building their own browser that supports their search service.

I’m surprised that Google is walking on both sides of the line – it’s dirty, but I guess they can legally make these claims since Microsoft is classified as a monopoly.
Truth is that Google may not build their own browser, but they are distributing a browser (Firefox) with their own toolbar built in AND the default search box in Firefox happens to use Google because Google pays the Mozilla Foundation well for that privledge. I don’t think there’s much difference between that and IE7 defaulting to use MSN search. Of course Google isn’t the official publisher of Firefox and isn’t a monopolist, so they probably have enough legal footing to cry wolf like they are.
Comment by Mike Bijon — Tuesday, May 2, 2006 @ 5:17 pm