<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Allows Class Action Against Target Website for Missing Image Alt Attributes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metamend.com/blog/2007/10/05/judge-allows-class-action-against-target-website-for-missing-image-alt-attributes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metamend.com/blog/2007/10/05/judge-allows-class-action-against-target-website-for-missing-image-alt-attributes/</link>
	<description>Search engine and Website Marketing tips, information, news and opinion from Metamend's team of SEM and SEO experts. The Metamend Blog covers SEO, search engines, search trends, search engine optimization and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hlinski</title>
		<link>http://www.metamend.com/blog/2007/10/05/judge-allows-class-action-against-target-website-for-missing-image-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-28415</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hlinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamend.com/blog/2007/10/05/judge-allows-class-action-against-target-website-for-missing-image-alt-attributes/#comment-28415</guid>
		<description>I am no expert (on anything really as you can tell) but my limited knowledge of American law (from watching Murder One) tells me that the argument may be: 
- if high street stores must legally provide disabled access then the same should apply for web businesses.

Even if the lawsuit goes nowhere, with an ever aging population, accessibility issues must be addressed within e-commerce sites if this expanding market is to be exploited.

As far as Googles&#039; products and services are concerned, Google Webmaster Help is the law, and it must be respected. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am no expert (on anything really as you can tell) but my limited knowledge of American law (from watching Murder One) tells me that the argument may be:<br />
- if high street stores must legally provide disabled access then the same should apply for web businesses.</p>
<p>Even if the lawsuit goes nowhere, with an ever aging population, accessibility issues must be addressed within e-commerce sites if this expanding market is to be exploited.</p>
<p>As far as Googles&#8217; products and services are concerned, Google Webmaster Help is the law, and it must be respected. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.metamend.com/blog/2007/10/05/judge-allows-class-action-against-target-website-for-missing-image-alt-attributes/comment-page-1/#comment-28404</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamend.com/blog/2007/10/05/judge-allows-class-action-against-target-website-for-missing-image-alt-attributes/#comment-28404</guid>
		<description>Interesting... but HTML rules are not a federal law yet...  
:)
...and Google Webmaster Help is not a US government ...yet 
 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; but HTML rules are not a federal law yet&#8230;<br />
:)<br />
&#8230;and Google Webmaster Help is not a US government &#8230;yet<br />
 ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

