<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and Rat rods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metamend.com/blog/2009/07/27/twitter-and-rat-rods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metamend.com/blog/2009/07/27/twitter-and-rat-rods/</link>
	<description>Search engine and Website Marketing tips, information, news and opinion from Metamend's team of SEM and SEO experts. The Metamend Blog covers SEO, search engines, search trends, search engine optimization and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Busmann</title>
		<link>http://www.metamend.com/blog/2009/07/27/twitter-and-rat-rods/comment-page-1/#comment-78684</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Busmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamend.com/blog/?p=1045#comment-78684</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
I agree with you about Twitter. There is a lot of hype and it seems to be the &quot;social media du jour&quot; but to me it lacks a second act; after you have let everyone know &quot;What you are doing now&quot;, you are pretty much....done. Having said that, I do believe that at current, it is beneficial to add Twitter to your SEO arsenal as it is difficult to argue with the results. While I remain unconvinced that it will withstand the test of time, I don&#039;t see the harm in using all means available to further your SEO goals, and search engines seem to really pick up on it right now. I will say that when you start to see your results waning, I personally would probably shed the &quot;tweets&quot;, and with the new found time, tag all your photobucket shots with targeted keywords, and never look back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
I agree with you about Twitter. There is a lot of hype and it seems to be the &#8220;social media du jour&#8221; but to me it lacks a second act; after you have let everyone know &#8220;What you are doing now&#8221;, you are pretty much&#8230;.done. Having said that, I do believe that at current, it is beneficial to add Twitter to your SEO arsenal as it is difficult to argue with the results. While I remain unconvinced that it will withstand the test of time, I don&#8217;t see the harm in using all means available to further your SEO goals, and search engines seem to really pick up on it right now. I will say that when you start to see your results waning, I personally would probably shed the &#8220;tweets&#8221;, and with the new found time, tag all your photobucket shots with targeted keywords, and never look back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Twining</title>
		<link>http://www.metamend.com/blog/2009/07/27/twitter-and-rat-rods/comment-page-1/#comment-78519</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Twining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metamend.com/blog/?p=1045#comment-78519</guid>
		<description>Yeah interesting take. I think Twitter is totally hyped. Its a useful concept but only really celebrities or other standouts are likely to ever gain a huge following.

What do you think of all the people who are telling people to use Twitter for Search Engine Optimization of their blogs etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah interesting take. I think Twitter is totally hyped. Its a useful concept but only really celebrities or other standouts are likely to ever gain a huge following.</p>
<p>What do you think of all the people who are telling people to use Twitter for Search Engine Optimization of their blogs etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

