Recently, Twitter has entertained the notion of existing as a licensed application by either Google or Microsoft. This venture has the potential to be another in a series of recent evolutions in how we search online, given that both of the major search engines have stated that they would incorporate “tweets” into their search results. How would this development change our search results? I see this having a couple of different outcomes with some shared effects:
First, and most obviously, companies would be absolutely negligent not to develop or start their Twitter presence immediately if this licensing effort is successful. Granted, we will have to sort through the “What I’m doing now” posts that involve mundane daily items like ”Eating Cheetos and washing the cat.” However, imagine Frito Lay’s horror as that search result possibly pushes down one of their “Cheetos” or related sites in the search results? No “LOL” at the board meeting that month.
Next, entertainment companies could benefit from real-time feedback in the form of Tweets in the search results. This becomes a situation where a performance, movie, or other event is evaluated by the patrons from their internet phones at the event. Then, via Tweets and complicit search engine, an evaluation could be determined fairly quickly. This has the potential to be either a dream or curse to marketing departments everywhere. I acknowledge that this is possible now, but when a search engine is complicit in this undertaking, the results will be undeniable.
Finally, this could simply be an acquisition like so many others in the past, that they squeeze the final marrow from Twitter’s bones and then relegate it to “App” status, positioned just down the street from Orkut.
Twitter critics who blast Twitter for no business model would now have to let it go, because no one questions Google nor Microsoft, and I doubt anyone can question their respective successes. Especially in the wake of the September U.S. Core Search Rankings, listing Google as possessing approximately 65% of all searches, Bing with a basically static 10% and Yahoo down to 18% from 19% the month earlier.
I had personally felt that Twitter had no second act earlier this summer and without this cash intervention, I still feel that way. As always, enough money can make pipe dreams come true and an infusion of Microsoft or Google money is probably enough to bring this Frankenstein back to life.
Twitter: To Bing or not to Bing
Tuesday, October 20, 20091 Comment »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Find it!
Popular Posts
- SEO and Webmaster Tools - Section 2 (Getting Going)
- Matt Cutts Keynote from SES London
- Reviewing a Perilous Transition - The News of March 2008
- Metamend and The Aberdeen Group
- Wordpress SEO Theme
- Google and Page Speed, How do I make my Website Faster?
- 1,519 Names in One Sweep...What a Week.
- Twitt.er, Twe.et or Tw.it?
- SEO Enterprise Level Outsourcing – Why This Makes Sense in This Economy?
- "Yes My Son, I Want You to Download 10 Hail Mary rev 2.3, Build 7, Service Pack 2s..."

Social medias are useful tools in driving traffic to websites. I think it is even superior from the conventional advertising techniques such as email marketing and paid advertisements. Besides that it is free, you can find tons of social medias that you can intertwine to your blog content which automatically updated the feeds on your websites.
Comment by 2Go Media — Tuesday, November 10, 2009 @ 8:45 pm